THE NEW LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION TECHNIQUE: MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANS-PSOAS APPROACH (DIRECT LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION (DLIF®)) AND A PRELIMINARY REPORT OF CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS IN BANGKOK SPINE ACADEMY
Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical tech nique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006;6:435-43.
Anand N, Baron EM, Thaiyananthan G, et al. Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:459-67.
Marotta N, Cosar M, Pimenta L, et al. A novel minimally invasive presacral approach and instrumentation tech nique for anterior L5-S1 intervertebral discectomy and fusion: technical description and case presentations. Neurosurg Focus 2006;20:E9.
Pimenta L, Diaz RC, Phiilips FM, et al. XLIF® for lumbar degenerative scoliosis: outcomes of minimally invasive surgical treatment out to 3 years post-op. Seattle, WA: North American Spine Society, 2006.
Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ, et al. Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1993;18:2227- 223
Flynn JC, Price CT. Sexual complications of anterior fusion of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:489-92.
Brau SA. Mini-open approach to the spine for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: description of the procedure, results and complications. Spine J 2002;2:216-23.
Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Suba ch BR, et al. Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 2002;51:97-103; discussion 103-5.
Chen, MPP*, Tong KB, Laouri M. Surgical treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The Spine Journal 2010;10 :588-94.
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:794-810.
Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review. Spine 2005;30: 2312-20.
Angus S. Don, FRACS, Eugene Carragee, MD. A brief overview of evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with surgery. The Spine Journal 2008; 8:258-65. 1
Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O’Brien MF, et al. The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis wi th spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:461-72.
Hercowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondy lolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:802-8.
Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a pro spective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 1997;22:2807-12.
Mardjetko SM. Connolly P J, Shott S. Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis of Litera ture 1970-1993. Spine 1994;19:2256-65.
Kwon B, Katz JN, Kim DH, et al. A review of the 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 2006;31:245-9.
Gupta MC: Degenerative scoliosis. Options for surgical management. Orthop Clin North Am 2003;34:269-79.
Islam N, Wood KB, Transfeldt EE, et al. Extensions of fusions to the pelvis in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:166-73.
Shapiro GS, Taira G, Boachie-Adjei O. Results of surgical treatment of adult idiopathic scoliosis with low back pain and spinal stenosis: a study of long-term clinical radiographic outcomes. Spine 2000;28:358- 63.
Swan J, Hurwitz E, Malek F, et al. Surgical treatment for unstable low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a prospective controlled study of posterior instrumented fusion compared with combined anterior posterior fusion. Spine J 2006;6:606-14.
Chen DF, Fay LA, Lok J, et al. Increasing neuroforaminal volume by anterior interbody distraction in degenerative lumbar spine. Spine 1995;20:74-9.
Ricardo SG. Umeta, Avanzi O. Techniques of lumbar sacral spine fusion in spondylosis: systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. The Spine Journal 2001;11:668-76.
Chad D. Cole, Todd D. McCall. Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2009; 2:118-26.
Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Cir cumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 2002;27:2674-83.
Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, et al. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa) 1976 ;26:2521-32; discussion 2532-24.
Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ. Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010 Jan 15. 28. Wright N. XLIF- the United States Experience 2003-4. International Meeting on Advanced Spinal Techniques Banff Alberta, Canada, 2005.
