Electronic ISSN 2287-0237

VOLUME

THE EFFECT OF GAUZE-BASED, NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND DRESSING ON SKIN GRAFT SURVIVAL: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

SEPTEMBER 2020 - VOL.16 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE
OBJECTIVES:

To compare the success rates of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) survival for gauze-based and foam-based Negative-Pressure Wound Dressing (NPWDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A single-center, prospective, cohort study was conducted to compare the STSG survival rates of gauze-based and foam-based NPWDs at Days 7 and 30 post-surgery. Sixty-nine patients underwent STSG and NPWD procedures. In all, 79 wounds required dressing: 42 had a foam-based NPWD applied, while the remaining 37 wounds had a gauze-based NPWD. Wall-suctioned, continuously negative pressure was applied at -100 mmHg for 7 days.

RESULTS:

At Day 7, the median graft survivals of the foam- and gauze-based NPWDs were 89.74% and 87.63%, respectively. At 30 days, the median graft survival for the foam- and gauze-based NPWDs were 95.2% and 92.01%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the graft survival of the 2 groups. The success rate of graft survival for the gauze-based NPWD proved to not be inferior to that of foam-based NPWD.

CONCLUSION:

Gauzed-based NPWD is non-inferior to foam-based NPWD in terms of STSG survival. Gauze can be used as an alternative NPWD for STSG immobilization.

Keywords:

gauSze-based; negative pressure wound therapy; skin graft

Received: November 26, 2019

Revision received: January 17, 2020

Accepted after revision: July 3, 2020

BKK Med J 2020;16(2): 153-157.

DOI: 10.31524/bkkmedj.2020.21.001

SEARCH VOLUME & NUMBER
GO
RECENT VOLUME & NUMBER