Electronic ISSN 2287-0237



  1. Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. AnnR Coll Surg Engl 2017;89(2):104-7.
  2. Ahern J. Clinician involvement in the teaching of anatomy tomedical students. AMJ 2015; 8(7): 247-8.
  3. Periya SN. Teaching human anatomy in the medicalcurriculum: a trend review. Int J Adv Res 2017;5(4):445-48.
  4. Hildebrandt S. Lessons to be learned from the history ofanatomical teaching in the United States: The example of theUniversity of Michigan. Anat Sci Educ 2010;3:202-12.
  5. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, et al. Medical educationin the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue toblow. Anat Sci Educ 2009;2(6):253-9.
  6. McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: Ghosts of thepast, present and future. Med Educ 2006;40(3):243-53.
  7. Moro C, McLean M. Supporting Students’ Transition toUniversity and Problem-Based Learning. Med Scie Educ2017;27(2):353-61.
  8. Anand MK, Singel TC. A comparative study of learning withAnatomage virtual dissection table versus traditionaldissection method in neuroanatomy. Indian J Clin AnatoPhysio 2017;4(2):177-80.
  9. Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, et al. The effectiveness ofvirtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medicalanatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10(6):549-59.
  10. Moro C, Stromberga, Z, Stirling, A. Virtualisation devices forstudent learning: comparison between desktop-based (OculusRift) and mobile-based (Gear VR) virtual reality in medicaland health science education. AJET 2017;33(6):1-10.
  11. Kuehn BM. Virtual and Augmented Reality Put a Twist onMedical Education. JAMA 2018;319(8):756-8.
  12. Ramsey-Stewart G, Burgess AW, Hill DA. Back to the future:teaching anatomy by whole-body dissection. Med J Aust2010;193(11-12):668-71.
  13. Azer S, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integratedproblem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of firstandsecond-year students. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29(2):173-80.
  14. Mathiowetz V, Yu CH, Quake-Rapp C. Comparison of a grossanatomy laboratory to online anatomy software for teachinganatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2016;9(1):52-9.
  15. Custer T, Michael K. The Utilization of the AnatomageVirtual Dissection Table in the Education of Imaging ScienceStudents. J Tomogr Simul 2015;1:102.
  16. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching methodin medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ2007;41(1):15-22.
  17. Birt J, Stromberga Z, Cowling M, et al. Mobile mixed realityfor experiential learning and simulation in medical and healthsciences education. Information 2018;9(2):31.
  18. Scientific American. Expertise insights illumination. 2017.(Accessed at January 4,2018 at https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/virtues-of-the-virtual-autopsy.).
  19. Becker GJ.Virtues of virtual autopsy. J Am Coll Radiol 2005;2(4):376-78.
  20. Moro C, Covino J. Nutrition and growth: Assessing the impactof regional nutritional intake on childhood development andmetacarpal parameters. Anat Cell Biol 2018;51(1):31-40.
  21. Moro C, Edwards L, Chess-Williams R. 5-HT2A receptorenhancement of contractile activity of the porcine urotheliumand lamina propria. Int J Urol;2016;23:946-51. doi: 10.1111/iju.13172
  22. Moro C, Chess-Williams R. Non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic,non-purinergic contractions of the urothelium/lamina propriaof the pig bladder. Auton Autacoid Pharmacol, 2012;32:53-9.doi:10.1111/aap.12000.
  23. Moro C, Leeds C, Chess-Williams, R. Contractile activity ofthe bladder urothelium/lamina propria and its regulation bynitric oxide. Eur J Pharmcol 2012;674(2-3):445-9. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.11.020.
  24. Afsharpour S, Gonsalves A, Hosek R, et al. Analysis ofimmediate student outcomes following a change in grossanatomy laboratory teaching methodology. J Chiropr Educ2018;32(2):98-106. doi:10.7899/JCE-17-7.
  25. Drake RL, Lowrie DJ Jr, Prewitt CM. Survey of gross anatomy,microscopic anatomy, neuroscience, and embryologycourses in medical school curricula in the United States. AnatRec 2002;269 (2):118-22.
  26. Periya SN, Sebihi A. Self-Directed learning in moderneducation: a trend review and perspectives of Gulf MedicalUniversity model, United Arab Emirates. Int J Eco Busi 2017;5(5):5-9.
  27. Rosenzweig M, MacEachern M, Masters C. The Anatomagetable: an innovative approach to anatomy education. 2017.(Accessed at January 4, 2018 at http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136885).
  28. Quentin-Baxter M, Dewhurst D. An interactive computerbasedalternative to performing a rat dissection in theclassroom. J Biol Educ 1992;26(1):27-33.
  29. Downie R, Meadows J. Experience with a dissection opt-outscheme in university level biology. J Biol Educ 1995;29(3):187-94.
  30. Chan I, D’Eon M, Haggag H, et al. The Effectiveness ofLearning Anatomy and Medical Imaging Using the AnatomageTable Compared with Prosections. Conference Paper May2015: Joint Congress on Medical Imaging and RadiationSciences, At Montreal, QC.